A counterargument is simply a perspective that refutes your main argument for those of you unfamiliar with the term. To put it simply, if you’re arguing that technology does more good than damage, the counterargument is the fact that technology does more harm than good.
Before we view an instance, you can find two things I’d choose to mention: first, we cannot stress essential transitions come in composing effective counterarguments. Without them, your reader could have no chance of after your train of idea and certainly will find it too difficult – or even impossible – to tell apart between which a few ideas you accept and which tips you disagree with.
Another key factor of great counterarguments may be the concession – this is certainly, the acknowledgement that some components of the argument that is opposing legitimate. Here is the most unknown element of counterarguments for most students – is not your whole point of a counterargument to “disprove” the argument that is opposing?
Finally, yes, the target is to show why your argument wins down. Having said that, the idea of the concession is always to illustrate that you’ve seriously considered a problem very very carefully, in a way that is nuanced compared to simple black/white, good/bad terms. When presented demonstrably, this particular consideration really strengthens your argument.
Relating to attitude x, _______________________. using one hand,
-it holds true that _______________________.
-this claim has some merit because _______________________.
-the declare that _______________________ has some validity.
On the other side hand,
-this viewpoint does not consider that _______________________.
-this claim overlooks the fact that _______________________.
Let’s observe how this will play call at an example paragraph that runs on the individual instance (yes, those will always be fine). It does not make use of the template exactly, however it’s pretty close.
Again, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released by the ACT. For the intended purpose of this exercise, we’re just planning to check one of many views; wanting to make use of a lot more than that might be too confusing. In reality, you really need to generally avoid integrating a lot more than one outside perspective per paragraph, until you are a stellar journalist who’s currently more comfortable with this particular back-and-forth.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is generally speaking thought to be a indication of progress, exactly what is lost as soon as we exchange humans with devices? Because of the variety that is accelerating existence of smart devices, it really is well well worth examining the implications and definitions of the presence inside our life.
Attitude 1: that which we lose with all the replacement of men and women with devices is some element of our mankind. Also our encounters that are mundane longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for others.
Thesis: Technology must certanly be viewed as a force for good since it produces brand new opportunities for folks along with a more successful culture.
1) Topic sentence: introduce your argument (1 phrase)
In the last few decades, brand brand brand new types of technology have actually produced means for individuals talk to one another more easily and quickly than in the past.
2) Elaborate on your own argument, and supply a certain example (2-3 sentences)
From Skype to iphones apps to Twitter, technology erases boundaries, permitting us to speak with individuals halfway around the globe as though they certainly were within the room that is next. We have really benefitted extremely from all of these technologies: my loved ones immigrated into the united states of america from Asia once I ended up being 6 years of age, and in the last ten years, gathering round the computer to speak to my grand-parents and my aunt in Beijing is becoming a ritual that is weekly. As we did when I was little, I am nevertheless grateful to be able to see their faces and keep them updated on the details of my daily life – something that would be impossible without “smart” machines although I am sorry that we no longer live next door to them.
3) Introduce outside perspective: 1-2 sentences
Not every person can be so thinking about the consequences of the latest technologies, but. Attitude 1 offers a typical complaint, particularly that the replacement of individuals with devices “causes us to get rid of some element of our mankind.”
4) Acknowledge that the viewpoint is not totally incorrect, and explain why (2-3 sentences)
This complaint does have some merit on one hand. Walking across the street or sitting in the subway, i will be often struck because of the number that is sheer of staring glassy-eyed to their phones. They generally are incredibly busy texting which they almost bump into other people, showing an obvious not enough courtesy and threshold (notice exactly how this declaration weaves the standpoint obviously to the writer’s argument) .
5) change back once again to your argument and reaffirm it sentences that are(3-4
Having said that, however, some great benefits of technology far outweigh an intermittent sidewalk that is unpleasant – at minimum from my perspeective. As opposed to separate me personally through the global world(notice just exactly exactly how this declaration indirectly refutes the counterargument) , “smart” technology has offered mainly to facilitate my relationships with other people, to not change them.
After providing a synopsis for the brand new ACT essay plus some feasible ways to it during my previous post , i do want to now talk about one specific – and essential – skill associated with composing it: integrating other views into the very very own argument for help.
You probably have some experience integrating the ideas of people you agree with into your writing if you’ve ever written a research paper. (and in case you have actuallyn’t, you’ll get an introduction to performing this in this post.) Having said that, I realize that most high schools do maybe maybe not clearly show pupils to weave supporting quotations, a few ideas, etc. fluidly in their writing. The quotes is there, but they’re often integrated awkwardly in to the bigger argument.
Often, pupils assume which they don’t need to spending some time launching or describing their quotes since they seem therefore self-explanatory. They’re here to aid the argument, and in the event that argument is obvious, then your point regarding the quotation is obvious…right? Well, not at all times.
The problem is the fact that analytical writing requires a whole lot more explanation than may seem necessary. Most of the time, individuals talk about subjects with that they are familiar. They are often unaware of the gaps in other people’s understanding because they know a lot of about their topics. As outcome, it simply will not happen to them how explicit they must be, and so they wind up unintentionally making out information this is certainly essential to understanding their way of thinking.
You must take your reader by the hand, so to speak, and lead them through each step of your thinking process so that they do not get lost when you explain an idea – any idea – buy essays online in writing. Presenting other people’s words or some ideas in a way that produces clear the connection betwixt your argument and theirs is a key section of that procedure. Otherwise, it is as you’ve skipped ahead a steps that are few making your reader to prevent and decide to try come up with the pieces. If there’s one thing you don’t wish to accomplish to your audience, it’s make your opinions difficult to follow. That is true of college, the ACT, and just about every other writing you might do for the following sixty or seventy years.
Yet again, we’re planning to use the sample prompt released by the ACT.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is typically thought to be a indication of progress, but exactly what is lost as soon as we exchange people with devices? Because of the variety that is accelerating existence of intelligent devices, its well well worth examining the implications and definitions of these existence inside our everyday lives.
Attitude 1: that which we lose with all the replacement of men and women with devices is some element of our mankind. Also our mundane encounters no longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for others.
Perspective 2: Machines are great at low ability, repeated, jobs, and also at high rate, exceptionally accurate jobs. In both situations, these are typically much better than humans. This efficiency results in a far more successful and world that is progressive every person.
Perspective 3: Intelligent devices challenge our longstanding concept of exactly what people are and may be. This might be good as it pushes people and devices toward brand brand new opportunities.